Legal Opinion

Nanez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided July 28, 2011No. 07-09-0339-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BRIAN QUINN, Chief Justice.

What we have before us is an appeal attacking trial counsel’s performance. Appellant, Rufus Sito Nanez, III, was convicted on two counts of aggravated sexual assault. He and his appellate attorney attempt to sway us to believe that trial counsel provided Nanez ineffective assistance in eighteen different ways. Whether either appellant or his attorney read this court’s opinion in Beck v. State, 976 S.W.2d 265, 268 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1998, pet. refd) (especially the last paragraph) is unknown but we respectfully suggest that they do. And, we affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Cannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Beck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  4. Ex Parte NiswangerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  5. Howard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. James Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  2. Manuel Gutierrez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API