Legal Opinion

Edelbrock, LLC v. Whipple Industries, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 1, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01502Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 EDELBROCK, LLC, Case No. 1:19-cv-01502-DAD-EPG 13 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING 14 v. CLAIM CONSTRUCTION 15 WHIPPLE INDUSTRIES, INC, doing business (ECF Nos. 40, 44, 45, 47, 48) 16 as Whipple Superchargers, 17 Defendant. 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiff Edelbrock, LLC (“Edelbrock”) filed this action against Defendant Whipple 21 Industries, Inc. doing business as Whipple Superchargers (“Whipple”) alleging infringement of 22 United States Patent No. 9,683,481 (the “‘481 Patent”),…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API