Legal Opinion
Strange v. James
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 5, 1971No. Civ. T-4713PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Strange, brings this action before a three-judge panel of the United States District Court and asks the court to declare K.S.A.1970 Supp. 22-4513 unconstitutional and to enjoin its enforcement. 1
The statute in question is a provision under the Kansas Aid to Indigent Defendants Act which, in brief, provides that whenever any state expenditure is made under the Act to provide counsel or other defense services to any indigent defendant, the defendant shall be liable to the State of Kansas for a sum equal to such expenditure, and such sum shall be recovered, if…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- James v. StrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- Paul X. Duhart v. Norman A. Carlson, Director of Prisons, John N. Mitchell, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Steven Leland Olson v. James R. James, Judicial Administrator, Iley Simmons v. James R. James, Judicial Administrator, and State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.