Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Murray

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided May 26, 2005No. 6:92-cr-00283PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, District Judge.

In this action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff Ronald Davidson claims that employees of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”) subjected him to unconstitutional conditions of confinement during various periods of incarceration at the Attica Correctional Facility. 1 Defendants have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Item 207), and plaintiff has cross-moved for summary judgment on his first cause of action (Item 224). For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted,…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cusamano v. SobekDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2009
  2. Jackson v. Onondaga CountyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
  3. Tafari v. McCarthyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2010
  4. Burroughs v. MitchellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2018
  5. Dolberry v. LevineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API