Legal Opinion

Pease v. Minnesota Steel Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1936No. 30,625PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 265 N.W. 427, 266 N.W. 854. Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an order granting workman's compensation.

December 8, 1928, the employe-respondent, Mr. Pease, in the course of his employment by the employer-relator, Minnesota Steel Company, as a switchman, had his hand caught between two cars which he was attempting to uncouple. He was immediately examined by relator's physician, who found nothing more serious than a bruised thumb. The thumb was bandaged and respondent went back to work. He continued for some two or three months to receive periodical treatment from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Nyberg v. Little Falls Black Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Pease v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Knopp v. GuttermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Rosvold v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 102Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Jones v. Thermo KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Bergstrom v. O'Brien Sheet Metal Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API