Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mann

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 2003PublishedCited by 291 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY DEL SOLE, P.J.:'

¶ 1 Appellant Gary Mann appeals from his judgment of sentence following denial of his post-sentence motions. Upon review, we affirm.

¶ 2 The facts of this case were summarized by the trial court as follows:

The evidence presented at trial established that on August 29, 1999, at approximately 11 p.m., Arthur Adams, Jr. met Hugh Davis and the two men went to Davis’ mother’s home and then, between 12:30 and 1 a.m., to a speakeasy located at Cumberland and Cleveland Streets, where they each had a shot of alcohol and purchased beer to go. As the two men drove home in Mr.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. KimballSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. DowlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. DrumhellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by291 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MourySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. PollardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. HylandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

286 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API