Legal Opinion
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Joe's Stone Crabs, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 12, 2002No. 01-12917PublishedCited by 194 opinions
1Per curiam
Joe’s Stone Crab, Inc. (“Joe’s”) appeals the district court’s entry of judgment in favor of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) on the EEOC’s claims, under Title VII, that Joe’s intentionally discriminated against four female applicants — Carol Coyle, Raquel Munoz, Catherine Stratford, and Teresa Ro-manello. Although none of these women actually applied for a position during the actionable time period, the district court found that Joe’s was liable because its discriminatory hiring practices during that time period deterred the women from applying. Because this finding is not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by194 opinions
- Smith v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Loretta Wilson v. B/E Aerospace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Delores M. Brooks v. County Commission, JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Rioux v. City of Atlanta, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- William Riccard v. Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.