Legal Opinion

Sluss v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 19, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2019-3658Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MATTHEW SLUSS, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-3658 (JEB) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Matthew Sluss, a citizen of both the United States and Canada, would prefer to serve the remainder of his 33-year sentence north of the border — or not serve it at all. Believing a Canadian prison would grant him parole, Sluss has applied to the Federal Bureau of Prisons for three separate transfers, each of which was denied. After the most recent denial, he brought this pro se action under…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API