Legal Opinion

Weisfield v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1935No. 25410. En BancPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Seattle, a city of the first class, for some years had, and still has, an initiative ordinance fixing the salary rates of civil service employees or officers in class “C” of the police department and class “D” of the fire department. A. large number of such officers were induced to give purported waivers of portions of their monthly salaries from July 1, 1932, to July 1, 1934. One of such officers was ft. B. Wells, of the fire department, the validity of whose waiver was litigated, wherein it was determined in State ex rel. Knez v. Seattle, 176 Wash. 283, 28 P. (2d) 1020, 33 P. (2d) 905, that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rauch v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Rummens v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Porter v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Jones v. McGrawWashington Supreme Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Love v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Goff v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API