Warren v. Warren
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Yan Burén. (Buck, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff brings this suit, alleging that the defendants have wrongfully combined together and alienated the affections of her husband, George L. Warren, from her, and caused him to desert and abandon her, and she claims damages therefor. The court below held that a-married woman in this State cannot maintain an action of this kind. The correctness of this holding is the only question to be determined.
In Mitchell v. Mitchell, 49 Mich. 68, by an equal division of this Court, the judgment of the court below against the wife was affirmed. In that case it appears that the husband was a minor…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bennett v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Foot v. CardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Michigan, Central Railroad v. ColemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Duffies v. DuffiesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Logan v. LoganIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Nolin v. PearsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- King v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Hastings Ex Rel. Hastings v. James River Aerie No. 2337North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Lockwood v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.