Legal Opinion
Sea Link Int'l, Inc. v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided March 25, 1997No. Civil Action CV296-94PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Sea Link Int’l, Inc. (“Sea Link”), brings this diversity action based upon the common-law and statutory contract laws of Georgia. 1 Currently before the Court is the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant, Osram Sylvania, Inc. (“Osram”), pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, OSRAM’s motion for summary judgment will be
FACTS
This case accurately represents the inherent complexity and potential risks of engaging in component parts manufacturing and trade on an international scale in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Mize v. Jefferson City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Cornelious Howard v. Bp Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Lordmann Enterprises, Inc. v. Equicor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rare, LLC v. Marciano (In Re Rare, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2003