Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Hanford

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1859PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from an order of the City Court of Brooklyn, directing judgments to be set off. This was an action hy Daniel Brooks against William BL Hanford, to recover damages for assault and battery. The facts-are fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.*—Brown, J.

1. This is an appeal from an order made by the City Court of Brooklyn in this action. It appears by the papers that one Samuel Hanford recovered a judgment, before a justice of the peace, against the above-named plaintiff, Daniel Brooks, for the sum of $90.28, on the *34525th of June, 1858, which was docketed in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings, before the trial of the present action. On the 10th of September, 1858, the same was duly assigned to the defendant Hanford. On the 15th day of September, the present action, which was for an assault and battery upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Nicoll v. NicollCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  3. Kellogg v. SchuylerNew York Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. ConradSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Jacobsen v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Sanders v. GillettNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878
  4. Wabash Railroad v. BowringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API