Legal Opinion

Titusville Trust Co. v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1953No. Appeals, 112 and 113PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

A narrow question is involved — was the evidence sufficient to prove a gift mortis causa?

An action of replevin without bond was instituted by the Titusville Trust Company, Administrator d.b.n. of the Estate of O. P. Collins against Edith Johnson and her son, Cecil Johnson, to recover certain stock certificates of various corporations of the approximate value of $25,000., which were registered in the name of the decedent at the time of his death. An answer was filed setting forth that Cecil Johnson did not claim any right in these certificates, but his mother, Edith…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Appeal of WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. McDonald v. FerrebeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Yeager's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Kaufmann's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Connell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brown v. Shirks Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Sivak EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. In Re the Estate of KelseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. In Re Estate of GladowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Polinelli v. Union Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API