Legal Opinion

Douglas v. Perez

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 31, 2025No. 3:24-cv-03983Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES DOUGLAS, Case No. 24-cv-03983-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL 10 PEREZ, Re: Dkt. No. 37 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff James Douglas’s Motion to Substitute Counsel. ECF 15 No. 37. Stanley Goff, Plaintiff’s current counsel of record, has indicated he “does not oppose Mr. 16 Douglas’s right to terminate his legal representation of him if that is what he wishes to do.” ECF 17 No. 39. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beam v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Joseph E. Di Loreto, Inc. v. O'NEILLCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Federal Savings And Loan Insurance Corporation v. AngellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API