Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Likover v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1978No. 37160Published

1ConcurrenceKrenzler, P. J.

I concur in the judgment of affirmance with the following additional comment.

The intervenors below, the Sterns, sold Likover an apartment building. Ultimately, there were two mortgages on the property held by two savings and loan associations. The sellers, the Sterns, were personally liable on both mortgages, while Likover remained the fee holder.

Likover defaulted on his payments on the second mortgage, and foreclosure proceedings were commenced by the second mortgagee savings and loan. After the litigation was completed, the Sterns were required to pay off both mortgages, which they in fact…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paine v. Copper Belle Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Paine v. Copper Belle Mining Co. of Ariz.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API