Legal Opinion

Vu Li Nieman v. Peterson

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided October 6, 1978No. Civ. A. No. 122525PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JENSEN, J.

This is an appeal by a lessor from a judgment in an unlawful detainer action.

Facts

Appellant leased the first floor of a hotel to respondent for the purpose of operating a bargain center and any use incidental thereto. Respondent agreed to comply with all laws and to not alter the premises without the lessor’s consent. Although the lessee agreed to procure his own policy of public liability insurance, the lease did not require the lessee to pay any part of the lessor’s insurance on the hotel. However, paragraph 6 of the lease provided: “Insurance Hazards: No use shall be made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Wheelright v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Schoolcraft v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Vitek, Inc. v. Alvarado Ice Palace, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kemp v. SchultzAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API