Legal Opinion

Dallas County Constable Precinct 5 Michael D. Dupree v. KingVision Pay-Per-View, Ltd.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 5, 2007No. 05-05-00601-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice FRANCIS.

This appeal involves a writ of execution and allegations that Dallas County Constable Precinct 5 Michael Dupree failed to performed his duty with respect to the writ. After a hearing, the trial court found both Dupree and his surety, American States Insurance Co., hable for the full amount of the underlying judgment and awarded KingVision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. damages and attorney’s fees. In separate briefs, both Dupree and American States challenge the trial court’s order.

For the reasons set out below, we conclude there is no evidence that American States was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. In Re BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Farmers Branch v. Ramos, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  2. Eric B. Darnell v. Carmen Broberg and Michael J. Zimprich, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018
  3. Union Carbide Corp. v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. IFC Credit Corp. v. Specialty Optical Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  5. Davis v. Rupe, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API