Legal Opinion

Stein v. Alabama Secretary of State

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 16, 2014No. 13-15556PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In this ballot access case, we consider whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the Alabama Secretary of State on the Plaintiffs’ claim, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that Alabama’s ballot access statute violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. After reviewing the record and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

Alabama law provides that political parties must qualify to appear on the general election ballot, and they may do so by either performance or petition. The performance option grants statewide…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Munro v. Socialist Workers PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Democratic Executive Committee of Florida v. Laurel M. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Green Party v. KempDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
  3. Michael Polelle v. Florida Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
  4. Independent Party of Florida v. Secretary, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. MajorDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API