People v. Carter

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his motion to suppress the identification testimony of Francine Bunton, a witness, was improperly denied. We disagree. The suppression court properly found that the procedure employed here was merely confirmatory in view of the fact that the witness had seen defendant on several prior occasions and knew him by another name (see, People v Green, 155 AD2d 880, lv denied 75 NY2d 813; People v Suren, 131 AD2d 896, 897, lv denied 70 NY2d 804; People v Johnson, 124 AD2d 748, 749, lv denied 69 NY2d 713). Thus, defendant’s argument…