Legal Opinion

Herr & Co. v. Parr

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided April 4, 1977No. 272Published

1Opinion of the Court

WICKERSHAM, J.,

This case presents the question as to whether a landlord, who has established no lien by levy or distraint, has any claim upon the proceeds of funds derived from a sheriff’s sale made pursuant to levy upon goods of the tenant by a creditor having a perfected purchase money security agreement with that tenant. . . .

Our plaintiff asserts that a landlord’s right of lien cannot exist vis-á-vis a secured creditor without an actual distraint or levy; or that even should such a lien exist, it is subservient to such a security interest. At common law, where the landlord’s right of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Quaker City Uniform Co., Inc., Bankrupt. Daniel P. VeloricCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  2. In Re Uni-Lab, Inc., Bankrupt, York & Foster, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  3. Moss's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  4. Wadas v. SharpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  5. Groh v. KimCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API