Legal Opinion
John Forsythe Co. v. Forsythe Shoe Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 1, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment appealed from should be modified so as to read:
“ Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant be restrained and enjoined from continuing the use of the name ‘ The Forsythe Shoe Corporation ’ in connection with its business in New York State as hereinafter provided.
“ Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant be restrained and enjoined from continuing to use the name ‘ Forsythe ’ as a part of its corporate name in connection with the acts hereinafter restrained, and it is further
“ Ordered, adjudged and decreed that the defendant be restrained and enjoined from continuing…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Avon Shoe Co., Inc., and Haymaker Shoe Corp. v. David Crystal, Inc., Haymaker Sports, Inc., B. Altman & Co., Best & Co., Inc., and John WanamakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Maison Prunier v. Prunier's Restaurant & Cafe, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1936
- Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. MindlinNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. First American Fund of Funds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Martha Washington Candies Co. v. Martha Washington Ice Cream Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.