Clark v. Kensell
Ohio Supreme Court
Assumpsit upon a note signed F. B. O. Kensell & Co. Plea, nonassumpsit, without affidavit. The plaintiff offered to read the note in evidence.
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT.
The evidence offered is intended to affect Snyder, whose name does not appear on that note. To make the evidence effectual against him, some proof will be necessary to show that Snyder was a member of the firm of Kensell & Co. The order of the evidence is of little consequence.
The plaintiff then read an entry in the books of the commissioner of insolvents, on the application of the defendant, Snyder, to be discharged from arrest, in which the note in contest is described [481 in the schedule of the debts due from Kensell & Co., “of which I am a partner.”
BY THE COURT. The…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Pittsburg, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway v. GillelandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Pennsylvania & New York Railroad & Canal Co. v. BunnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Wilmington & Reading Railroad v. StaufferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Snyder v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867