Legal Opinion

Groupement Financier Liegois v. Cutten

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1942PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Each of the plaintiffs moves through counsel to stay the trial of this action, it being the position of the moving parties that each plaintiff is a non-resident alien enemy and comes within the purview of subdivision (b) of section 7 of the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 7, subd. [b]), and which, so far as here material, reads as follows: “ Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to authorize the prosecution of any suit or action at law or in equity in any court within the United States by an enemy or ally of enemy prior to the end of the war * * *.”

Enemy is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rothbarth v. HerzfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Rothbarth v. . HerzfeldNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Southern Tier Masonic Relief Ass'n v. LaudenbachNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Kaufman v. EisenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  5. O'Hora v. Tarby, New York County Courts1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of HohmNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API