Legal Opinion

State v. Atkins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 6, 1964No. 18208PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brailsford, Justice.

The defendants were convicted of receiving stolen goods and they have appealed. * The sole exception charges that the court “erred in failing to grant a directed verdict of not guilty as to each defendant, the error being that the evidence was insufficient to establish the guilt of the defendants.” Absent challenge by the State, we have disregarded the generality of this exception (Shell v. Brown, 243 S. C. 380, 134 S. E. (2d) 214) and have examined the testimony in the light of defendants’ argument. We have no hesitancy in concluding that the evidence, to which we refer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. AtkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Shell v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCrary v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. FrankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  3. Walters v. HardenDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
  4. Dupree v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API