Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1951No. Civ. 17899; Civ. 17900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

This is an action for divorce or rather we should say two actions for one and the same divorce, one instituted by the wife against her husband and the other by the husband against the wife.

The wife instituted her action for divorce in propria persona by filing her complaint on February 3, 1949, but without serving her husband with summons. Without knowledge of her action the husband filed his action for divorce on March 14, 1949. The wife filed an answer therein to the merits and not by way of abatement. The husband likewise filed an answer in the action instituted by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Capuccio v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Dean v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. HowardNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Rosen v. RosenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  3. Manzanares v. ManzanaresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API