Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Zimmerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 26, 1989, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

The record reveals that there was no compelling reason for claimant and her husband to move to Maryland but that it *863was done simply because he had retired and desired to live there. There was also no evidence that claimant could no longer afford to live in the area where she had been employed (see, Matter of Palmieri [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 588). Therefore,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SteedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. In re PalmieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API