Legal Opinion

Kramer v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Carro, J.

We are confronted with the question of whether a notice of claim is required where a cause of action sounding in fraud is alleged against a doctor, when the fraudulent acts were separate from, and subsequent to, acts giving rise to malprac*406tice claims by plaintiff against the doctor and his municipal employer. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that, insofar as the fraud claim is concerned, plaintiff was not bound by the notice of claim provisions of the General Municipal Law.

Plaintiff-appellant Paula Kramer was diagnosed as having scoliosis in 1962, when she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Derlicka v. LeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Harkin v. CulletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Kral v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Lium v. PloskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Palmer v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. D'ANGELO v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Zhumi v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API