Legal Opinion
Rauschkolb v. Di Matteo
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 2, 1938No. 34450PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
The plaintiff instituted foreclosure proceedings on a $7,000.00 note executed by defendant and secured by a mortgage on cer-' tain immovable property located in the Town of McDonoghville (now the City of Gretna), and subsequently filed a supplemental and amended petition alleging that Joseph, Ignacio, Francisco, Leonardo, Antonio, Maria, Salvador and Francesco Fradella claimed to be the owners of an undivided 1/18 interest each in the mortgaged real estate and prayed that they be made parties defendant and that demand for payment be made upon them, in default of which a writ…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- H. R. Hayes Lumber Co. v. H. M. Jones Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Hand v. HarperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Frierson v. Shreveport Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Lacassagne v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
- Schrock v. BoldingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Knighten v. American Automobile Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Hamilton v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Bell v. Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. JordanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.