Legal Opinion
Ransom v. Bebernitz
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 24, 2001No. 00-142PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Amestoy, CJ.
This appeal arises from a dispute among great great grandchildren over their respective rights to a certain tract of land conveyed by an 1882 probate decree according to the terms of their great great grandfather’s will. Defendants, members of the Anderson family, appeal the Rutland Superior Court’s judgment that plaintiff has a 9/31 interest in the subject land, and the court’s order to partition of the property. Defendants assert that the trial court erred in concluding that (1) the 1882 probate decree is not subject to collateral attack on the ground that the will violated the.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Webster v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Sparhawk v. Administrator of Ozias BuellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837
- Superior Oil Corporation v. AlcornCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Chittenden v. Waterbury Center Community Church, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Harlow v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mann v. LevinSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- Whippie v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- Glover v. GloverAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- In re Appeal of the Estate of Elaine A. Holbrook Late of Salisbury, Vermont (David Holbrook, Cheryl Holbrook and Charles Holbrook III, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re Appeal of the Estate of PerrySupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.