Commonwealth v. Ciampa
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.
We are again asked to consider whether a defendant’s claim that he was not given the required “alien warnings” pursuant to G. L. c. 278, § 29D, at a plea hearing, *460can be met with a reconstruction of the record consisting of a statement by the hearing judge that it was his standard practice to give the warnings.
On February 25, 1983, a judge of the Superior Court accepted Ciampa’s guilty plea to a charge of armed robbery, for which he received a suspended sentence and two years’ probation. In November, 1998, the Immigration and Naturalization Service initiated deportation hearings against…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MahadeoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. RzepphiewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. StoteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HilaireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. DiazMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. HilaireMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Valdez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Cybulski v. VaianiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.