Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ciampa

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 4, 2001No. 99-P-1282PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.

We are again asked to consider whether a defendant’s claim that he was not given the required “alien warnings” pursuant to G. L. c. 278, § 29D, at a plea hearing, *460can be met with a reconstruction of the record consisting of a statement by the hearing judge that it was his standard practice to give the warnings.

On February 25, 1983, a judge of the Superior Court accepted Ciampa’s guilty plea to a charge of armed robbery, for which he received a suspended sentence and two years’ probation. In November, 1998, the Immigration and Naturalization Service initiated deportation hearings against…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. MahadeoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. RzepphiewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. StoteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HilaireMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. DiazMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. HilaireMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Valdez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Cybulski v. VaianiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API