Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Diaz

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 6, 2009No. 08-P-511PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSikora, J.

This appeal presents a recurrent situation: the motion of an alien defendant to vacate a long past conviction because of an alleged omission of the required warning of immigration consequences by the judge receiving the defendant’s plea of guilt or his admission to facts sufficient for a finding of guilt; and the submission of that motion years after the routine destruction of the record of the colloquy between the plea judge and the defendant.

Facts. In the District Court on March 7, 1994, the defendant, Plinio Diaz, admitted to facts sufficient to warrant a finding of guilt on the charge…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. AcevedoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. VillalobosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. RzepphiewskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrannumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. SylvesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  3. Commonwealth v. AlmonteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. MarquesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. TokarevMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API