Putnam Investment Co. v. Titus
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hutchison, J.:
We have here two cases, one by the Putnam Investment Company, the other by the Putnam Trust Company, both against W. P. Titus, the first being based upon a contract and account, later secured by a chattel mortgage, and the latter upon a note secured by a chattel mortgage. Replevin proceedings were resorted to in both cases, redelivery bond being given in the first case but not in the second. The personal property covered by the chattel mortgages was, with a few exceptions; the same in each, and the mortgage of the investment company was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bequillard v. BartlettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Reeves & Co. v. BascueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- School District No. 3 v. Western Tube Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Bliss v. VedderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Jackman v. LambertsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Herzig v. Commercial State BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Cantrell v. Molz-Frick Implement Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Cantrell v. Molz-Frick Implement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960