People v. Sternberg
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. William T„ Wallace, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This casé, while possessing many features in common with the case of People v. Sternberg, Crim. No. 65, ante, p. 3, differs from it in certain essentials which demand consideration. Sternberg is here prosecuted for procuring the false registration of David Newman. Newman testified to the circumstances of his false registration at the solicitation of defendant. Lust bore like testimony, he having been present at the time *13Sternberg induced. Newman to commit the crime. Stern-berg, when the three were together, asked them both to register from the Baldwin Hotel. They went to the registrar's…
2Cited by10 opinions
- People v. FrahmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- State v. DouglasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. SwoapeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Reid v. OwensUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. MonteverdeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.