People v. Swoape
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
On an information which charged R. L. Swoape, William F. Patterson, and Charles Slack with the crime of grand larceny, the defendants Patterson and Slack were convicted. Each of them appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
At the outset it is urged by appellant Slack that he is entitled to a new trial for the reason that by the order of the trial court he was denied a separate trial from his co-defendants. By the information all the defendants were charged jointly with the commission of the offense, and in such circumstances by statutory provision the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. BurpeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
- Moschell v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
- People v. HotzIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. TinninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. CowanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.