Legal Opinion
Arnold v. White
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1908No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error to Lenawee; Chester, J. Case by Edward B. Arnold against Elmer J. White for a breach of warranty in the sale of certain horses. There was judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings, error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Plaintiff brought suit in an action on
the case for damages for a breach of warranty in the sale of a team of horses and set of double harness purchased by plaintiff from defendant in March, 1905. The declaration filed in the case, omitting the formal entitling, was as follows:
*608“Edward B. Arnold, plaintiff herein, by Smith, Baldwin^; Alexander, his attorneys, complain of Elmer J. White, the defendant herein, of a plea of trespass on the case. Suit having been commenced by summons.
“ For that whereas: on to wit, the 15th day of March, A. D. 1905, at the said county, in consideration that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carter v. GlassMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Doyle v. PeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Greenwood v. John R. Thompson Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919
- Glann v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1914