Legal Opinion

Plunkett v. Ginsburg

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1995No. A94A2012PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

We granted interlocutory appeal to consider the trial court’s grant of a motion for protective order. The order prohibited the discovery of the records of a psychiatrist treating plaintiff Ginsburg, who had sued Plunkett as a result of an automobile accident.

The accident occurred on June 13, 1991 and Ginsburg, an optometrist, has not worked again since. Her complaint alleged that she had suffered “severe and great pain of body and mind.” During discovery, Dr. Rascoe, the psychiatrist, was identified as one “who rendered treatment to her following the automobile accident.”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Walker v. Jack Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Wilson v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. Wiles v. WilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Duronslet v. KampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Mincey v. Georgia Department of Community AffairsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Cooksey v. LandrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  4. Manning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Hicks v. Talbott Recovery System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API