Auten v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Pierron, J.:
The appellants, Joe Auten and Paul McMahon, appeal a decision of the district court, affirming the Kansas Corporation Commission’s (KCC) dismissal of their claim against Southwestern Bell Telephone Company (Bell). The appellants ar gue the KCC and the district court erred in finding that Bell was not in violation of K.S.A. 66-109 when Bell’s pay telephones would not make change for amounts received in excess of 350 for a local phone call.
The facts in this case are straightforward and undisputed. The appellants filed a two-count class action in Wyandotte County District Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re ZivanovicSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Mobil Exploration & Producing U.S. Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- In Re the Appeal of Topeka SMSA Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Kansas Pipeline Partnership v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
- Farmland Industries, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Castro v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Pruter v. Larned State HospitalCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- Mathena v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
- Stutzman v. City of LenexaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
- Castro v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001