Castro v. IBP, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Wahl, J.:
IBP, Inc., appeals the decision of the Workers Compensation Board (Board) finding an expert’s opinion admissible and *476awarding Martha Castro a sum for permanent partial general disability.
The appellant argues that the Board improperly interpreted K.S.A. 1999 Supp. 44-510(c)(2). Interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court can review de novo. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 263 Kan. 875, 879, 953 P.2d 1027 (1998). The interpretation of a statute by an administrative agency charged with the responsibility of enforcing that statute is entitled to judicial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- In re ZivanovicSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Copeland v. Johnson Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
- Woodward v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
- Shields v. J. E. Dunn Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Dold Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Stephen v. Phillips CountyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- Deguillen v. Schwan's Food Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Castro v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001