Cheeves v. Danielly
Supreme Court of Georgia
Construction. Damages. Torts. Charge of court. Water-courses. New trial. Before Judge Boynton. Monroe superior court. August term, 1886. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
Danielly brought bis action against Cheeves to recover damages, for and on account of Cheeves’ having turned a portion of a stream of water known as Yellow creek from its natural flow, by digging a ditch from a point just opposite his (Cheeves’) land on Yellow creek, to a point on *116Tobesofkee or Big creek, just opposite the plaintiff’s land, thereby emptying the waters of Yellow creek into Tobesofkee or Big creek, and causing the latter to fill up with sand, or other obstructions, and raising the water of the creek so that the lands of the plaintiff were overflowed, causing…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Mayor of Macon v. DykesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- O'Connell v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Danielly v. CheevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Sprayberry v. SnowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. RapeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.