Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Richman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Van Kirk, J.:
The complaint states a cause of action for rescission only and tenders a return of the property, the stock of goods, fixtures and good will which the plaintiffs had purchased from the defendants. The plaintiffs paid to defendants the sum of $23,750 by check and by two notes of $2,500 each, one maturing May 23, 1924, and the other September 23, 1924. The action for rescission was begun September 19, 1924. In October, 1924, an action was begun by Philip Richman against these plaintiffs to recover on the promissory note due September 23, 1924; these two actions were consolidated.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Cobb v. . HatfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Weigel v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- McNaught v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Slater v. SlaterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stauss v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re the Arbitration between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Goldman v. SontagAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Castiglia v. LucasNew York Supreme Court · 1928