Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Sontag
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 1, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.
Defendants Anna Sontag, Abraham Sontag, H. Kimmelman & Co., Inc., and Harry Kimmelman have appealed from a unilateral judgment of rescission in favor of the plaintiff, which determines that the agreement between plaintiff and Agassiz Realty Corporation is void; that a deed given by plaintiff to defendant Anna Sontag conveying a residence in Sullivan county is void, and the clerk of that county is directed to make an appropriate entry in his records; that a conveyance by Anna Sontag of the residence in Sullivan county to the defendant Rose Park Corp. is void, and the clerk of the county is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gould v. . Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Gould v. Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- E. T. C. Corp. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Friedman v. RichmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Friedman v. RichmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Goldman v. SontagAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941