Legal Opinion

Bundy v. Cocke

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 12, 1888No. 42PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THH DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatchford

On the 4th of February, 1885, Martin L. Bundy, receiver of the Hot Springs National Bank, of Hot Springs, in the State of Arkansas, filed his bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Kentucky, against William M. Cocke and Amanda M. Cocke, his wife, and James Flanagan and Sue Flanagan, his wife, all of the defendants being alleged in the bill to be citizens of Kentucky.

The bill alleges that, on the 1st of March, 1884, the bank was a corporation created and organized under the national banking statutes, with a capital stock of $50,000, divided into 500…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Milliken v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Executors of Fooks v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. Allender v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  3. Foster v. ChaseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1896
  4. Witters v. SowlesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont · 1889
  5. Robinson v. TurrentineU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API