Legal Opinion
Blake v. Farrell Lines, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 2, 1969No. Nos. 17725-17728PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HASTIE, Chief Judge.
Each of these appeals challenges an order which requires a consolidated jury trial of a longshoreman’s diversity suit for damages against the owners of a ship, upon which he allegedly was negligently injured, with the shipowner’s consequent separate suit in admiralty for indemnity against the longshoreman’s employer, a stevedoring company with *265which the shipowner had contracted for the performance of shipboard cargo operations during the course of which the longshoreman’s injury occurred.
After filing the separate indemnity suit in admiralty, each…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Waring v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dearborn Marine Service, Inc. v. Chambers & KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Edward J. Romero v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Trident Maritime Agency, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Luera v. M/V ALBERTACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Simko v. C & C Marine Maintenance Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Philadelphia Ship Maintenance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.