Simko v. C & C Marine Maintenance Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents the question whether John R. Simko, III occupied the status of a seaman for purposes of recovery under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, at the time of his death. It also requires this Court to venture into the maelstrom of the maritime doctrine of unseaworthiness and its counterpart, the right of a shipowner to claim indemnity from a stevedore for expenses incurred in defending an action for damages brought by the stevedore’s employee.1
I
John Simko was hired by C & C Marine Maintenance Company (C & C) as a laborer. He was assigned the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Fitzgerald v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United New York & New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Ass'n v. HaleckiSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Thomas W. Griffith v. Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation and American Commercial Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Alfred Avins, in No. 79-1747 v. James P. White, in No. 79-1748Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Benny Earl Farrell, an Oklahoma Citizen v. Klein Tools, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Hubert Wayne Johnson v. John F. Beasley Construction Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.