Legal Opinion

Gersing v. Chafitz

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 8, 1942No. 8384PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

It appears from the preliminary record filed in this case that on June 5, 1942, judgment for plaintiff on the verdict of the jury was entered by the Clerk of the trial court pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. Thereafter, on July 2, 1942, a motion for new trial was filed. On July 7, 1942, the motion for new trial was “overruled, both on merits and because filed too late.” On July 27, 1942, a motion for reconsideration of denial of the motion for new trial and for stay of judgment was filed, and on August 31, 1942, this motion was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Conboy v. First Nat. Bank of Jersey CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Bowman v. LoperenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Dante v. BagbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1913
  5. Doyle v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  2. Microwave Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. Gabriel Di Giovanni v. Anthony Di Giovannantonio, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. De Foe v. National Capital Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Howell v. Terminal R. Ass'n of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API