United States v. Michael Saari
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERTS, District Judge.
In Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 590, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 1382, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980), the Court summarized its now familiar holding as follows:
In terms that apply equally to seizures of property and to seizures of persons, the Fourth Amendment has drawn a firm line at the entrance to the house. Absent exigent circumstances, that threshold may not reasonably be crossed without a warrant.
At issue in the instant appeal taken by the United States is whether the actions of the law enforcement officers who arrested Defendant Michael Saari crossed that firm line. We…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Deborah Audra Skousen v. Brighton High School, Paul Rambo, a Michigan State TrooperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Clifford Cummings, Jr. v. City of Akron Rodney Sherman and Howard Vaughn, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Slusher v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Robert Andrews v. Hickman County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Elvan Moore v. Kevin PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.