Legal Opinion

In re Firestorm 1991

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1996No. 62318-0PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

— This case involves the review of a trial court decision disqualifying Plaintiffs’ counsel for conducting an ex parte interview with an expert hired by counsel for the Defendants. The trial court concluded this ex parte interview violated CR 26 and disqualification was the appropriate sanction. Based on the facts of this case and the discussion herein, we reverse the order of disqualification, order reinstatement of counsel, and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Shortly after filing suit in this case and after requesting, as reported in the media, for anyone with relevant information as to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. MMR/Wallace Power & Industrial, Inc. v. Thames AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
  4. FIRST SMALL BUSINESS INV. CO. OF CA. v. Intercapital Corp. of OregonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mayer v. Sto Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Soter v. Cowles Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Soter v. Cowles Pub. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API