Legal Opinion

State v. Patterson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 4, 1926No. 27569PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Defendant appeals from a conviction and sentence for having intoxicating liquor in his possession for sale for beverage purposes. The sole bill of exception in the record was taken to the action of the judge in overruling a motion for a new trial. In this court, defendant has filed an assignment of errors, attacking the constitutionality of Act 39 of the Extra Session of 1921, under which he was prosecuted and convicted.

As only questions of fact were raised by the motion for a new trial, the ruling of the trial judge with respect thereto presents nothing for review.

Defendant’s first objection…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Ex Parte GilmoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. State v. GuidrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. In Re KinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Succession of Watson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API