Legal Opinion

Hodge v. Palms

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1902No. 1,011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan.

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.

This case, in respect to some of the* principal questions involved, is like that of Fletcher v. McArthur (No. 1,010, just decided) 117 Fed. 393, and the two cases were argued together. This case, also, was here on a previous occasion on appeal from a decree sustaining a demurrer to the bill. The decree was reversed, and the cause remanded, with a direction to permit the defendants to answer if they should so elect. 37 U. S. App. 61, 15 C. C. A. 220, 68 Fed. 61. Reference is made to those reports for facts not herein recited. The defendants answered, setting up several…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchel and Others v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. McPhaul v. LapsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Hodge v. PalmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  4. Fletcher v. McArthurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Middle East Trading & Marine Service, Inc. v. Mercantile Financial Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Fielder v. PembertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Lane v. WattsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API