Heiman v. Pan American Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNOT, Justice.
The plaintiff is the beneficiary under two policies of insurance; one for $5,000, and one for $10,000. Both policies provide for double indemnity in the event of the insured’s death by accidental means. The policies were in force less than two years, when the death of the insured was caused by a pistol shot while the insured was, at .the moment, alone in an automobile. The time the policies were in force is stated because they contain the following provision ;
“Self Destruction: — In the event of self destruction within two years from the date of the issue of this policy,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Webster v. New York Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Brignac v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Penfold v. . Universal Life Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Faulk v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Phillips v. Louisiana Equitable Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Bond v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Parks v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- McKinney v. American Security Life Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.